Partly allowed

Satya Narayan Rai @ Satnarayan Ray v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Mar 2024CR. MISC./16172/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought anticipatory bail in an assault case arising from a land dispute. The court allowed anticipatory bail for petitioner no. 1 with conditions but rejected the prayer of petitioner no. 2 due to the specific allegation of assaulting the informant with a knife.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner no. 1 to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing Rs.25,000 bail bond with two like sureties; petitioner no. 2's anticipatory bail rejected.

Satya Narayan Rai @ Satnarayan Ray Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16172 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-497 Year-2022 Thana- DARIYAPUR District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Satya Narayan Rai @ Satnarayan Ray Son of Basudev Rai Resident of Village- Devti Pokhara, P.S.- Dariyapur, Dist.- Saran at Chapra

¶5

Munna Rai Son of Satya Narayan Rai Resident of Village- Devti Pokhara, P.S.- Dariyapur, Dist.- Saran at Chapra

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajani Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 14-03-2024

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶16

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

Petitioners along with other accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant knife which caused injury on his hand.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He submits that the petitioner no. 1 is order giver. He further submits that petitioners have no

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16172 of 2024(2) dt.14-03-2024 2/2

¶20

criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

¶21

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer

¶22

for bail submits that there is specific allegation against petitioner no. 2 of assaulting the informant by means of knife.

¶23

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner no. 1 in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 497 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶24

So far as petitioner no. 2 is concerned, there is specific allegation against him, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner no. 2 on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶25

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶26

devendra/-

¶27

U T

Satya Narayan Rai @ Satnarayan Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satya Narayan Rai @ Satnarayan Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Taiyab Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Indrajeet Prasad @ Kamlesh Kumar @ Munsi Vs The State of Bihar

Uday Kumar @ Amit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rustam Miya Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Pukar Sah Vs The State of Bihar