Allowed

Jay Prakash Roy v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Mar 2024CR. MISC./15553/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail sought in a case of 279.39 litres of liquor recovered from two motorcycles. Petitioner claimed false implication, no possession, custody since 30.11.2023 and no antecedents. Court granted bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Jay Prakash Roy Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15553 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-478 Year-2023 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jay Prakash Roy Son of Late Umakant Roy Resident of Village- Mahuwa, P.S.- Khajauli, Dist.- Madhubani

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 05-03-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with G.R. No. 1732 of 2023, arising out of Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 478 of 2023, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 414, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

The prosecution case, in short, is that, 279.39 liters liquor was recovered from two motorcycles and the petitioner was apprehended on spot.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15553 of 2024(2) dt.05-03-2024 2/2

¶18

material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is further submitted that the petitioner is not owner of any of the seized motorcycles and he was a passerby. The petitioner is in custody since 30.11.2023 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.

¶19

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with G.R. No. 1732 of 2023, arising out of Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 478 of 2023.

¶22

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶23

Rajorshi/-

¶24

U T

Jay Prakash Roy v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jay Prakash Roy v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aashu Thakur @ Lalu Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Upendra Kumar @ Op Vs The State of Bihar

Bablu Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Pintu Sah @ Pintu Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Harijan Vs The State of Bihar