Allowed¶22

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Mar 2024CR. MISC./14015/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; Section 30(a) Bihar Excise Act; alleged recovery of 423.360 litres of liquor from a pond; Basantpur P.S. Case No. 17 of 2024; District Siwan; clean antecedents; no recovery from conscious possession; implication at instance of Chowkidar; Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions; bail bond Rs. 1,000/- with two sureties; Patna High Court Crl. Misc. No.14015 of 2024; Justice Satyavrat Verma; decided 07-03-2024.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail to both petitioners, conditioned on arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within six weeks, on bail bonds of Rs. 1,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions. ¶22

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14015 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2024 Thana- BASANTPUR District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Rai S/o Surendra Rai R/o vill - Murwar, P.O. - Bagahi, P.S. - Basantpur, Distt. - Siwan

¶5

Prabhat Kumar @ Jhunjhun Rai S/o Tukar Prasad R/o vill - Murwar, P.O. - Bagahi, P.S. - Basantpur, Distt. - Siwan

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhijeet Abhigyan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 07-03-2024

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶15

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶16

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 423.360 liters of liquor from a pond of Sukhal Ji.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from their conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14015 of 2024(2) dt.07-03-2024 2/2

¶20

and he came to be implicated at the instance of Chowkidar with whom he is on an inimical term, when petitioners admittedly are person with clean antecedent.

¶21

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

¶22

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Basantpur P.S. Case No. 17 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶23

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶24

Rishabh/-

¶25

U T

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Kanhaiya Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Chhathu Patel @ Rahul Patel Vs The State of Bihar

Mohan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kewli Yadava @ Kewli Yadav @ Kewal Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dashrath Paswan Vs The State of Bihar