Ram Babu Rai Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

4 26-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

¶14

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Baligaon P.S. Case No. 143 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 365 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, Section 302 of the IPC was added.

¶15

3. Prosecution case in short is that on 07-10-2023, informant daughter aged about 18 years was missing and he has apprehension that his daughter has been abducted by the petitioner and other co-accused persons.

¶16

4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 09-10-2023. Petitioner is stated to be man of clean antecedent.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13848 of 2024(4) dt.26-06-2024 2/3

¶18

5. It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case only on the basis of suspicion. It is submitted that there is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence. It is next submitted that victim has died and her dead body was recovered from the bank of the pond on 08-10-2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner goes on to submit that during the course of investigation, no specific allegation has been attributed to the petitioner. Referring to the postmortem report it is submitted that cause of death is stated to be asphyxia due to drowning in water.

¶19

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. It is submitted that from perusal of paragraph Nos. 2, 6, 7, 8 & 97 of the case diary, it would reveal that informant and other witnesses have supported the prosecution case. Referring to paragraph No. 25 of the case diary, it is submitted that dead body of the victim has been recovered from the bank of the pond.

¶20

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, clean antecedent of the petitioner, there being no direct involvement of the

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13848 of 2024(4) dt.26-06-2024 3/3

¶22

petitioner even in the case diary and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶23

8. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed , on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Baligaon P.S. Case No. 143 of 2023, subject to the following conditions:

¶24

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

¶25

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶26

Raj Kishore/- U T

¶27

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

Ram Babu Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Babu Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gaurav Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Avinash Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Vishal Patel @ Vishal Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ram Kripal Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Pawan Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Mahmada @ Master @ Alijan Nat @ Mohammad Alijan Vs the State of Bihar