Allowed¶18

Sukesh Rai @ Sukesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Mar 2024CR. MISC./13660/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; Section 438 Cr.P.C.; Sections 272, 273 IPC; Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act; 400 liters liquor recovery from hut; not apprehended from spot; Bidupur P.S. Case No. 609 of 2023; Vaishali; bail bonds Rs. 5,000/- with two sureties; surrender within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted: petitioner, on arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within six weeks, to be released on bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- with two sureties of the like amount, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ¶18

Sukesh Rai @ Sukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13660 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-609 Year-2023 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sukesh Rai @ Sukesh Kumar, S/o Yogendra Ray, R/o Vill - Pakari, Ward No. 7, P.S. - Bidupur, District – Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aniket Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Akbar Ali, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 06-03-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 400 liters of liquor from a hut, which is situated in front of the petitioner’s house.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and the place of occurrence does not belong to the petitioner and he came to be

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13660 of 2024(2) dt.06-03-2024 2/2

¶16

implicated on the basis of secret information, which is the easiest way to implicate someone.

¶17

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 609 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶19

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶20

Arish/-

¶21

U T

Sukesh Rai @ Sukesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sukesh Rai @ Sukesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mishri Mukhiya @ Mishrilal Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Mahesh Mandal @ Mahesh Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Yadav @ Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar