Petitioner sought bail in an NDPS case involving recovery of syrup from a tea shop. The court directed release on bail after examination of one witness upon furnishing bail bonds.
Bail directed after examination of one witness, bail bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12334 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-887 Year-2023 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul
======================================================
Surendra Yadav @ Mahadev Yadav, Male, aged about 26 years, S/o Jagdish Yadav R/o vill - Kajaha, Ward no. 15, P.S. and Distt. - Supaul (Bihar)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
ORAL ORDER
2 28-02-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
5.100 liters of syrup were recovered from a tea shop.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12334 of 2024(2) dt.28-02-2024 2/2
opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in connection with the NDPS case?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Surendra Yadav @ Mahadev Yadav
The State of Bihar
Ramesh Chand Malviya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
