Allowed

Barun Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Mar 2024CR. MISC./12028/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Cr.P.C. Section 438 conditions for his apprehended arrest in a liquor-related case involving recovery of illicit liquor from motorcycles pending at Jaynagar police station.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; petitioner to surrender within six weeks and furnish bonds of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Barun Yadav Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12028 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2023 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Barun Yadav S/O Ramashish Yadav R/O Village- Kuwadh, P.S- Jaynagar, Distt.- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 04-03-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No.122 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has three criminal antecedents and allegation is of recovery of 180 liters of illicit liquor from three motorcycles.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the seized motorcycles and he came to be implicated at the instance of Chaukidar with whom he is on an inimical term. It is

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12028 of 2024(2) dt.04-03-2024 2/2

¶18

also submitted that it appears that the Chowkidar, with a view to save the real culprit, falsely implicated the petitioner.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/(Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 122 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶22

annpurna/-

¶23

U T

Barun Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Barun Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amarjeet Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Rajgir Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Raghu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Sonelal Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Rajan Jha @ Rajan Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar