Raju Rai @ Raju Ray Vs The State of Bihar

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 159 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Sections 363, 365, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

As per prosecution case, the accusation against the petitioner is of being involved in kidnapping of the Informant’s minor daughter. It is alleged that when the Informant approached to Raju Rai/petitioner and made query then the accused/petitioner replied to the Informant that his son has rightly done this and told to the Informant to do whatever he wants to do.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10889 of 2024(4) dt.24-06-2024 2/3

¶20

petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case. He submits that there is no allegation kidnapping against the petitioner rather it has been levelled against his son/Sachin Kumar and five others. The petitioner has no role in the alleged occurrence. There is not an iota of evidence in the entire record against the present petitioner of being involved in the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is languishing in judicial custody since 14.03.2023 without any rhymes or reason.

¶21

On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner stating that this is a case of kidnapping the minor daughter of the Informant.

¶22

From the report of the Superintendent of Police, Vaishali dated 03.05.2024, it appears that the kidnapped girl of the Informant has been recovered and the son of the petitioner Sachin Kumar has been sent to judicial custody. The medical examination of the victim girl was done in which the doctor declared that the victim girl was three and half months pregnant. It has also been mentioned that the statement of the victim girl under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was made and is being preserved in

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10889 of 2024(4) dt.24-06-2024 3/3

¶24

the records of the court below. In the statement of the victim girl under Section 161 Cr.P.C., she has stated about love affair with Sachin, got married in the temple and being four months pregnant. It is also mentioned that the charge-sheet has been submitted against the son of the petitioner under Section 363, 366(A), 376/34 of the I.P.C., Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 9 of the Child Marriage Protection Act.

¶25

Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioner and keeping in view that the main allegation of kidnapping is against the son of the petitioner, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 159 of 2023.

¶26

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶27

rishi/-

¶28

U T

Raju Rai @ Raju Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Rai @ Raju Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhishek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Roshan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhoti Paswan @ Sajan Paswan @ Chhotu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Bhupendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Komal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Parshuram Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar