Allowed

Rupesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Jul 2024CR. APP (SJ)/907/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an appeal and set aside an order rejecting a prayer for anticipatory bail. The appellant, accused under IPC and SC-ST Act provisions, was directed to be released on bail upon paying a bond of Rs. 5,000 within six weeks if arrested.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 15.01.2024 set aside. Appeal allowed. Appellant released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties within six weeks of arrest or surrender.

Rupesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.907 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-377 Year-2023 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rupesh Kumar Son of Arun Kumar Bhagat @ Arun Kumar Bhakt Resident of Village- Ghariyari Chak, P.S.- Mehsi, District.- East Champaran

¶5

... ... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

North Bihar Power Distribution company Limited Regd. Office 2nd Floor, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna through Assistant Engineer Supply Division, Sub-Division, Chakiya, District- East Champaran

¶9

Wasim Son of Not Known Assistant Engineer Electricity Department, Chakiya, Resident of Village- Ghariyari Chak, P.S.- Mehsi, District- East Champaran

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Bhola Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sadanand Paswan, Spl.P.P. Mr. Shrekant Sharan Singh, APP

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA

¶15

ORAL ORDER

¶16

3 02-07-2024

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, the learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State along with learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.2 and 3. .

¶18

The appellant has challenged the order dated 15.01.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Mehsi P.S. Case No.377 of 2023, instituted for the offences under Sections 341,

¶19

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.907 of 2024(3) dt.02-07-2024 2/4

¶20

342, 353, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(r)(s) SC/ST Act, whereby their prayer for grant of anticipatory bail has been rejected.

¶21

The learned counsel for the appellant at the outset submits that appellant is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant.

¶22

It is next submitted that in sum and substance the allegation as alleged in the FIR, is that a raiding team raided the premises of the appellant for disconnecting the electricity connection, on account of accumulated unpaid dues, but the same was resisted by the appellant and his family members. Further it is alleged that the appellant assaulted Parash Rajak and did not allow him to enter his premises and took the motorcycle of one Md. Nausad Alam and thereafter the Assistant Engineer, Electricity, Maheshi gave information to the police. Accordingly, the police reached the place of occurrence and rescued the member of the raiding team, as such it is alleged that the appellant obstructed the respondents from discharging their official duty.

¶23

The learned counsel submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the allegation is exaggerated. It is next submitted that even

¶24

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.907 of 2024(3) dt.02-07-2024 3/4

¶25

presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then prima facie no offence under the SC / ST Act is made out, as it is not the case of the respondent that the appellant knowing that Parash Rajak belong to the SC community assaulted him nor it is the case of the informant that appellant and the raiding members were known to each other from before. It is also submitted that since the appellant was willing to pay the dues, but the raiding team members were not willing to listen to the appellant, as such an altercation took place and thereafter the instant FIR came to be instituted with an exaggerated allegation.

¶26

The learned appearing on behalf of the respondents opposes the appeal.

¶27

Regard being had to the aforesaid submissions, the order dated 15.01.2024 is set aside.

¶28

The appeal stands allowed.

¶29

The appellant above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.5000/-(Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Mehsi P.S. Case

¶30

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.907 of 2024(3) dt.02-07-2024 4/4

¶31

No.377 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶32

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶33

Prakash Narayan U T

Rupesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rupesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Sujit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Babu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Raushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Nasir Hussain @ Md. Nasir Vs The State of Bihar

Divyam Kumar Choudhary @ Julious @ Divyam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar