Dismissed¶20

Anup Prasad @ Anup Kahar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Nov 2024CR. APP (SJ)/728/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail refused; appeal dismissed; lower-court rejection affirmed. Murder/shooting case (IPC 302/323/506/120(B)/34) with Arms Act S.27 and SC/ST Act S.3(2)(va); Alamganj PS Case No. 297 of 2022, Patna; ABP No. 3929 of 2022 rejected 06.01.2023 by Special Judge SC/ST Act; appellant Anup Prasad @ Anup Kahar named in FIR; counsel argued false implication/village politics and non-attractability of SC/ST Act. Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.728 of 2023, Justice Anil Kumar Sinha, decided 18-11-2024.

What did the court decide?

The court declined to grant anticipatory bail to the appellant, having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the parties, the nature of allegation, the gravity of the offence, and the fact that the appellant is named in the FIR. ¶19

Anup Prasad @ Anup Kahar Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.728 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2022 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ANUP PRASAD @ ANUP KAHAR S/o Late Jamun Ram R/o Neem ki Bhatthi, Nala Par, P.S.- Alamganj, Distt- Patna.

¶5

... ... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Kallu Paswan S/o Yogendra Paswan R/o Neem ki Bhatti, Vishwakarma Mandir, Near to Nala, P.S.- Alamganj, Distt- Patna.

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Abhimanyu Deo For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

8 18-11-2024 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶12

2. An order, dated 06.01.2023, passed by learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, Patna, in ABP No. 3929 of 2022, is under challenge in the present appeal preferred under Section 14-A (2) of the Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, whereby the anticipatory bail application of the appellant in connection with Alamganj Police Station Case No. 297 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 302/323/506/120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3 (2)(va) of the Schedule

¶13

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.728 of 2023(8) dt.18-11-2024 2/3

¶14

Caste/Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, has been rejected.

¶15

3. The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report, is that one Deepu Chaudhary threatened the informant that his brother will die soon and later on co-accused Lallu Sah assaulted informant’s brother, who used to work with him. On 06.04.2022, when the informant’s brother went out to buy medicine, the informant, after some time, heard sound of bullet, consequently, he went out and saw that his brother was lying down and five persons, including the appellant, fled away giving threat to the informant. Subsequently, the informant's brother was taken to the hospital where during the course of treatment he died.

¶16

4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive and village politics. He next submits that the appellant has been implicated only on the basis of conjecture and surmise as the dispute was between the informant’s brother and one Lallu Sah and the appellant has nothing to do with it. He further submits that allegation of firing upon informant’s

¶17

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.728 of 2023(8) dt.18-11-2024 3/3

¶18

brother is not on the appellant, as such, SC/ST Act does not attract against him.

¶19

5. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation and gravity of offence and the fact that appellant is named in the FIR, accordingly, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶20

6. This appeal is, accordingly, rejected and the order, dated 06.01.2023, passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Patna, in ABP No. 3929 of 2022, affirmed.

¶21

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶22

ashwani/-

¶23

U T

Anup Prasad @ Anup Kahar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anup Prasad @ Anup Kahar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Prasad Sah @ Raj Kumar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Ganesh Pandit @ Ganesh Kumar Pandit @ Ganesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Aditya Kumar @ Aaditya Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kushwaha @ Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Subodh Singh @ Subodh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Kumar Prasad @ Vijay Sonar Vs The State of Bihar