The appellant's counsel requested withdrawal of the bail application as the accused had already been granted the benefit of default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.5480 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-914 Year-2023 Thana- KANTI District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Surendra Sah son of Raushan Sah Resident of Village- Sarmaspur, P.S.- Kanti, Dist- Muzaffarpur
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr.Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he
wants to withdraw this application as the petitioner has been granted the benefit of Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C.
withdrawn.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
kundan/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for bail should be withdrawn after the accused was released on default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Surendra Sah
The State of Bihar
Vikash Kumar Choudhary
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
