Partly allowed

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Kanhaiya Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Oct 2024CR. APP (SJ)/2197/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna, hearing an appeal against conviction under the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016, held that while conviction was not challenged, the severe sentence warranted modification. Relying on the appellant's prior custody and first-offence status, the court reduced the rigid term to the period already undergone.

What did the court decide?

Sentence of five years rigorous imprisonment modified to the period already undergone by the appellant.

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Kanhaiya Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2197 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2017 Thana- TARIYANI CHAPRA PS DistrictSheohar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Kanhaiya Singh Son of Vinod Singh Resident of Village - Bishambharpur, P.S.- Tariyani Chhapra, District- Sheohar

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Abha Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

5 22-10-2024

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned

¶11

A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The present appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 02.05.2019 and 03.05.2019 by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016 passed by the 2^nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Sheohar in Trial No. 385 of 2019 arising out of Tariyani Chhapra P.S. Case No. 25 of 2017, G.R. No. 789 of 2017 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and further awarded sentence one month in addition.

¶13

Learned counsel for the appellant, at the very

¶14

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2197 of 2019(5) dt.22-10-2024 2/2

¶15

outset, does not challenge the judgment and order of conviction and he limits his argument to the punishment awarded to him,

¶16

i.e., to undergo imprisonment of five years.

¶17

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has remained in custody in total for eleven months. It is further submitted that the appellant is not a habitual offender and this is the first offence committed by him.

¶18

In view of the aforesaid submission and considering the period of custody already undergone, this appeal is partly allowed by modifying the sentence. The sentence to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years with a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and further awarded sentence one month in addition is modified to that of the period already undergone by the appellant.

¶19

(Sandeep Kumar, J.)

¶20

sadique/-

¶21

U T

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Kanhaiya Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Kanhaiya Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Afaque Alam @ Md. Afaque Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Ramashish Ram @ Ram Ashish Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Saurav Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Anil Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Mahesh Bhagat Vs The State of Bihar

Yogendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar