Allowed

Ravi Yadav @ Raviranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jan 2024CR. APP (SJ)/1983/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal under Section 14(A)(2) SC/ST Act against refusal of anticipatory bail in a case involving caste abuse, teasing and assault. The High Court set aside the Special Judge's order and granted anticipatory bail to all three appellants on specified conditions.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order refusing anticipatory bail set aside; appellants to be released on anticipatory bail on bond of Rs.20,000 each with two sureties, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

Ravi Yadav @ Raviranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1983 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2023 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ravi Yadav @ Raviranjan Kumar, aged about 22 years, Gender-Male, Son of Rambilash Yadav @ Bilas Yadav, Resident of village-Khaira, P.S. - Amas, Distt. - Gaya.

¶5

Vithal Yadav @ Sonu Kumar, aged about 19 years, Son of Upendra Yadav, Resident of village - Khaira, P.S. - Amas, Distt. - Gaya.

¶6

Satyendra Yadav, aged about 50 years, Gender-Male, Son of Late Jagnarayan Yadav, Resident of village - Khaira, P.S. - Amas, Distt. - Gaya.

¶7

... ... Appellants

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar.

¶10

Barti Kumari, D/o Mukesh Kumar, Resident of village - Khaira, P.S. - Amas, Distt. - Gaya.

¶11

... ... Respondents

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellants : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent No.2: M/S. Praveen Kumar, Raju Kumar Singh and Anju Kumari Sinha, Advocates For the Respondent : Mrs. Usha Kumari 1, Spl. P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

5 12-01-2024

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned

¶16

counsel for the respondent no. 2 and learned Spl. P.P. for the

¶17

State.

¶18

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter in short referred to as the ‘SC/ST Act’) against the refusal of prayer of anticipatory bail of the appellants vide order dated 24.03.2023, passed

¶19

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1983 of 2023(5) dt.12-01-2024 2/4

¶20

by the learned Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST, Gaya in A.B.P. No. 57 of 2023 in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 46 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 308, 354, 354C of the I.P.C. and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act.

¶21

The prosecution case, in brief, is that the appellants and the co-accused persons are alleged to have used obscene words and teased the informant whenever she goes outside the house. When the informant and the female members of her house go for call of nature then the coaccused Satyendra Yadav watches them from the field. On protest, all the accused persons abused them calling their caste name and threatened to leave the village and assaulted them.

¶22

It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that the appellants are quite innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is submitted that there is land dispute between the parties. The informant wants to grab a portion of land bearing Khata No. 61, Plot No. 92, Area-10 decimals which was protested by the appellants due to which this false case

¶23

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1983 of 2023(5) dt.12-01-2024 3/4

¶24

has been lodged by the informant. It is further alleged that the appellants have filed several representations before the concerned police station as well as before the concerned Circle Officer. It is further submitted that no member of public was present at the relevant point of time of the alleged incident. Hence, no offence under SC/ST Act is made out against the appellants. The appellants have clean antecedent as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the memo of appeal.

¶25

Learned Spl. P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellants.

¶26

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances

¶27

of the case, the impugned order dated 24.03.2023, passed by learned Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST, Gaya in A.B.P. No. 57 of 2023 in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 46 of 2023, is set aside against the appellants. The criminal appeal is allowed.

¶28

Accordingly, the above named appellants, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged

¶29

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1983 of 2023(5) dt.12-01-2024 4/4

¶30

on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/(Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST, Gaya in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 46 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶31

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶32

U.K./- U T

Ravi Yadav @ Raviranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Yadav @ Raviranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashutosh Singh @ Rahul Singh @ Ashutosh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Aditya Kumar Thakur @ Belwa @ Aditya Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Biresh Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Devendra Kumar Lal Das @ Devendra Lal Das Vs The State of Bihar

Alex Sakib @ Sakib Khan Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Abhishek Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar