Land acquisition compensation dispute. State admitted the appellants' land was consumed and offered compensation assessed at Rs.4,68,099/-. The court disposed of the appeal, directing the appellants to apply for apportionment of the amount between father and son.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.997 of 2019 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8408 of 2019
======================================================
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Praveen Prakash, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Ballabh Pd. Yadav (AAG11)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR)
Date : 07-02-2023
A hard copy of the supplementary affidavit on behalf of
the State has been filed across the Board.
Let it be taken on record.
In view of the categorical stand of the State that the land of the appellants had been consumed and that the State is ready to compensate the appellants, nothing remains in this appeal to be decided.
Patna High Court L.P.A No.997 of 2019 dt.07-02-2023 2/2
The appellants have been informed about the value of the land has been assessed at Rs.4,68,099/-.
All that the appellants have to do is to file an application before the concerned authority as to how the amount shall be apportioned between him and his son.
It is expected that the decision in that regard by the State authority shall be taken without any delay as already the matter has become five decades old.
The appeal stands disposed of.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
kundan
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| Uploading Date | 10.02.2023 |
| Transmission Date |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal required further adjudication given the State's admission that the appellants' land was consumed and its offer to compensate.
Dharnidhar Mishra
Sushil Kumar Mishra
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The District Magistrate-cum-Collector Samastipur
The District Land Acquisition Officer Samastipur
The Circle Officer Hasanpur, Samastipur
Ashutosh Kumar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
