Saroj Kumari v. The Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
LPA 748/2022 & large batch | Patna High Court | 20-03-2024 | RTE Act Section 23 second proviso | untrained/unqualified Bihar elementary teachers termination/continuance | four-year window reinterpreted: commences 09.08.2017 (commencement of Amendment Act 2017), expires 08.08.2021 — Single Judge's 31.03.2019 cut-off rejected | retrospective effect from 01.04.2015 retained | writs dismissed, LPAs partly allowed, six directions issued | qualification by 08.08.2021 = deemed continuous service from initial appointment | post-31.03.2015 unqualified = invalid ab initio, terminate | NIOS 18-month online D.El.Ed (order 182459-61, 22.09.2017); S.O.1353(C) relaxation to 31.03.2015 with TET condition; NCTE authority via S.O.750(E) | relied: Zile Singh (2004) 8 SCC 1; St. Aubin (1951) 2 All ER 473; Finsbury Borough Council's Case (Asquith) | referred: Devesh Sharma v. Union of India 2023 SCC OnLine SC 985 | bench: K. Vinod Chandran CJ (author), Ashutosh Kumar J, Rajiv Roy J | individual representations to State Government; en masse representations discouraged.