Kamal Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Patna High Court LPA 69/2022, decided 09-07-2024 (bench: Chief Justice K. Vinod Chandran, author, with Justice Partha Sarthy); appeal dismissed. Keywords: absorption in vacancy; retention as contractual employee; no vested right; empanelled Executive Assistant / Data Entry Operators; Aurangabad district panel; District Health Society; outsourcing of Executive Assistant work through Agency; Government policy decision; State of Karnataka v. Umadevi (3), (2006) 4 SCC 1 (as relied on by the learned Single Judge, referred in this appeal); liberty reserved to participate in future recruitment; CWJC No.10148 of 2021; interlocutory applications disposed of.
What did the court decide?
The Division Bench found absolutely no reason to interfere with the judgment of the learned Single Judge and rejected the appeal, thereby upholding the Single Judge's determination that the appellants had no vested right to absorption or contractual employment and the stipulation regarding the Data Entry Operators qualifying examination.