Appellant sought withdrawal of a letters patent appeal arising from a dismissed writ petition over a service matter, noting a parallel writ petition had already been heard and dismissed by another Single Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.354 of 2022 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5231 of 2009
======================================================
Arun Kumar Prasad, Son of Late Narsingh Prasad Resident of VillageGopalpur, Post Office- Gopalpur, Via- Kiul RMS, District- Lakhisarai.
... ... Appellant/s Versus
Patna High Court L.P.A No.354 of 2022(6) dt.12-02-2024 2/3
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : ======================================================
Patna High Court L.P.A No.354 of 2022(6) dt.12-02-2024 3/3
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
6 12-02-2024 It is pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant that CWJC No. 11464 of 2012, titled as Arun Kumar Prasad vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. , the pendency of which had resulted in dismissal of the writ petition, has already been heard and dismissed by another learned Single Judge. Hence, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks withdrawal of the present appeal.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Harish Kumar, J)
Sujit/-
U
Arun Kumar Prasad
The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Secondary Education
K. Vinod Chandran
Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
