Disposed

Abhishek Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Apr 2023C. REV./189/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order in a review petition regarding a dismissal of a Letters Patent Appeal in a recruitment case grants the petitioner two weeks to cure defects. The Court eventually disposes of the petition as not pressed, granting liberty to pursue alternative remedies.

What did the court decide?

Review petition disposed of as not pressed; liberty granted to file appropriate appeal or avail alternative remedies.

Abhishek Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVIEW No.189 of 2021

¶2

¶3

Letters Patent Appeal No.415 of 2021

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Abhishek Kumar Singh Son of Sri Uma Shankar Singh resident of MohallaArfabad Colony, Nala Ke Paar, Bajrangpuri, West beside Kunj Apartment, P.O.- Gulzarbagh, P.S.- Alamganj, District- Patna.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Bihar General Administration, Old Secretariat, Patna.

¶9

The Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, Veterinary College Campus, Patna- 14.

¶10

The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College Campus, Patna- 14.

¶11

The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna.

¶12

The Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶13

The Agriculture Production Commission, Bihar, Patna.

¶14

The Director (Agriculture), Agriculture Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶15

The Vice Chancellor, Kerala Agricultural University, P.O.- Thrissur, Kerala, Pin- 680656.

¶16

The Registrar, Kerala Agricultural University, P.O.- Thrissur, Kerala, Pin680656.

¶17

Sl. No. 668 Roll No. 21500668, Percentage of Marks Obtained 49.987, through the Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna- 14.

¶18

Sl. No. 1037 Roll No. 21501037, Percentage of Marks Obtained 49.35, through the Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna- 14.

¶19

Sl. No. 1150 Roll No. 21511150, Percentage of Marks Obtained 52.08, through the Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna- 14.

¶20

Sl. No. 2310 Roll No. 21502310, Percentage of Marks Obtained 47.79, through the Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna- 14.

¶21

Sl. No. 3065 Roll No. 21503065, Percentage of Marks Obtained 50.89, through the Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna- 14.

¶22

Sl. No. 5778 Roll No. 21505778, Percentage of Marks Obtained 48.094, through the Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna- 14.

¶23

Patna High Court C. REV. No.189 of 2021(2) dt.05-04-2023 2/3

¶24

Sl. No. 8046 Roll No. 21508046, Percentage of Marks Obtained 48.9662, through the Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna- 14.

¶25

Sl. No. 8092 Roll No. 21508092, Percentage of Marks Obtained 50.69, Patna High Court L.P.A No. 415 of 2021 dt. 08-12-2021 2/5 through the Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna- 14.

¶26

Sl. No. 8206 Roll No. 21508206, Percentage of Marks Obtained 52.29, through the Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna- 14.

¶27

Sl. No. 8396 Roll No. 21508396, Percentage of Marks Obtained 47.79, through the Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna- 14.

¶28

Sl. No. 11166 Roll No. 21511166, Percentage of Marks Obtained 48.96111, through the Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna- 14.

¶29

Sl. No. 13706 Roll No. 21513706, Percentage of Marks Obtained 52.269, through the Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna- 14.

¶30

Sl. No. 13813 Roll No. 21513813, Percentage of Marks Obtained 61, through the Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna- 14.

¶31

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶32

======================================================

¶33

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Madhusudan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Prabhat Kumar Verma(AAG 3) : Dr. Mankeshwar Tiwary, AC to AAG 3

¶34

======================================================

¶35

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶36

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)

¶37

2 05-04-2023 The learned counsel for the review petitioner seeks two weeks’ time to remove the defects pointed out by the registry. Time so sought, is granted.

¶38

Now, coming to the merits of the case, the present review petition has been filed seeking review of the order dated 08.12.2021, passed in L.P.A. no. 415 of 2021, by which the

¶39

Patna High Court C. REV. No.189 of 2021(2) dt.05-04-2023 3/3

¶40

appeal filed by the review petitioner had stood dismissed.

¶41

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since none of the grounds, as envisaged under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 exists so as to warrant review of the order of this Court dated 08.12.2021, passed in L.P.A. no. 415 of 2021 nor any cogent or important evidence has been brought on record of the review petition nor there is any mistake apparent on the face of the record of the case, the review petitioner be granted liberty to file appropriate appeal.

¶42

Accordingly, the present review petition stands disposed off as not pressed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies, as are otherwise available under the law.

¶43

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶44

( Shailendra Singh, J)

¶45

rinkee/sanjay-

¶46

Abhishek Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhishek Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surya Pratap Singh Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department

Sanjay Kumar Mahto Vs The Union of India through the Finance Secretary, Ministary of Finance Government of India

Gopeshwar Kumar Ghosh Vs The State of Bihar