This single judge allowed a modification application in a writ petition to correct a typographical error in a 2021 order, reading 'Memo No.107' as 'Memo No.1071' consistent with the annexed original memo.
The order dated 03.02.2021 in CWJC No.8373 of 2020 is modified to read 'Memo No.1071, dated 04.05.2020' instead of 'Memo No.107'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.902 of 2021
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8373 of 2020
======================================================
Patna High Court MJC No.902 of 2021(3) dt.08-09-2023 2/4
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate.
Patna High Court MJC No.902 of 2021(3) dt.08-09-2023
3/4
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar, AC to GP-17.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 08-09-2023
Heard Mr. Bipin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Arbind Kumar, learned AC to GP-17 for the State.
Patna High Court MJC No.902 of 2021(3) dt.08-09-2023 4/4
CWJC No.8373 of 2020, stands modified to the extent indicated
above, thus, the modification application is allowed.
(Harish Kumar, J)
manoj/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the modification application praying for rectification of a typographical error in a previous order should be allowed?
Ramanand Sagar
Kamal Nayan
Ram Prasad Chaudhary
The State of Bihar
The Additional Chief Secretary-cum-the Principal Secretary Education Department, Government of Bihar
Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
