Disposed

Parsuram Yadav, v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Oct 2023MJC/713/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a non-implementation proceeding under Maintenance to Jails Control, the petitioner challenged delay in complying with earlier orders regarding encroachment. The court accepted the explanation of delay due to the pandemic and initiated proceedings as well as completed encroachment proceedings. The current petition was dropped.

What did the court decide?

The present M.J.C./Contempt Petition is dropped reserving liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 06.05.2023 or any other order in an independent writ petition.

Parsuram Yadav, Vs The State of Bihar — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.713 of 2021

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.118 of 2020

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Parsuram Yadav, S/o Late Sadhu Yadav, Resident of Village and Post-Basuari, P.S.-Ghoghardiha, Baswari, District-Madhubani.

¶6

... ... Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, namely, Shri Deepak Kumar.

¶9

Mr. Nelesh Ram Chandra Deore, presently as the District Magistrate, Madhubani,

¶10

Smt. Poonam Mishra, presently posted as the Circle Officer, BlockGhoghardiha, District-Madhubani.

¶11

... ... Opposite Parties

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG-12

¶15

======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶17

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

¶18

4 11-10-2023

¶19

The present M.J.C. petition is filed for noncomplinace of the orders of this Court dated 08.01.2020 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 118 of 2020.

¶20

Grievance of the petitioner is relating to certain encroachments. In this regard, this Court has directed the petitioner to submit a representation. Accordingly, petitioner had submitted representation dated 27.02.2020. Thereafter, the concerned authority was required to examine the petitioner’s representation within a period of three months from the date of

¶21

Patna High Court MJC No.713 of 2021(4) dt.11-10-2023 2/2

¶22

receipt of the order dated 08.01.2020. However, there is delay in complying the orders of this Court read with the contents of the petitioner’s representation.

¶23

The orders of this Court has been complied on 06.05.2023, whereas, the reasons assigned for delay is that Covid-19 pandemic was in vogue from March, 2020 till March, 2022. In the meantime, encroachment proceedings have been initiated in the year 2021 and it has been completed in the year 2023.

¶24

Taking note of these facts and circumstances, the present M.J.C./Contempt Petition stands dropped reserving liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 06.05.2023 or any other order in an independent writ petition.

¶25

(P. B. Bajanthri, J)

¶26

( Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶27

manish/-

¶28

Parsuram Yadav, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parsuram Yadav, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Swamy Kamalanayanacharya Ji Vs Sri Amir Subhani

The State of Bihar Vs Syed Raza Monir

Dhara Holiday Llp, Vs The State Bank of India

Parmatma Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

The State of Bihar Vs Baikunth Sharma

Magadh Stock Exchange Association, Vs The Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Central Revenue Building