Miscellaneous jurisdiction case concerning restoration of M.J.C. No. 589 of 2019. The court directed restoration if defects were removed within ten days, failing which there would be no restoration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.486 of 2022 In
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.589 of 2019
======================================================
Syed Nabi Karim
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The Bihar State Electricity Board ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ankit Katriar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
... ... Opposite Party/s
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
2 05-07-2023 M.J.C. No. 589 of 2019 shall be restored if the defect(s) are removed within ten days. If not, there shall be no restoration.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Partha Sarthy, J)
aditya/PKP
U
Syed Nabi Karim
The Bihar State Electricity Board
K. Vinod Chandran
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
