Contempt petition where the petitioner did not appear. Respondent counsel submitted that the impugned order had been complied with; the court accepted the submission. Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1841 of 2017
In
Letters Patent Appeal No.967 of 2014
======================================================
Raj Kishore Prasad Sinha son of Late Kapildeo Narayan Lal, resident of Mohalla- Sonar Tolli, P.S.- Khajekalan, P.O.- Jhauganj, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR)
press this contempt petition.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, learned Senior Advocate
for the respondents submits with reference to the affidavit placed on record that the order has been complied with.
Patna High Court MJC No.1841 of 2017(2) dt.13-04-2023 2/2
In view of the afore-noted statement made by
the counsel for the State, we consign the records of this
case and dispose it of accordingly.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
(Harish Kumar, J)
krishna/shivank
U
Raj Kishore Prasad Sinha
Central Bank of India and Others
Ashutosh Kumar
Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
