The High Court at Patna disposed of the Letters Patent Appeal as infructuous because the petitioner complied with the office objections during the pendency, leaving the writ challenge infructuous.
The Letters Patent Appeal was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1603 of 2019 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.341 of 2018
======================================================
Om Prakash Ram (M), aged about 52 years, S/o Sri Ram Harijan @ Late Ganga Ram Resident of Village Post Office- Pakwaliya, Police StationDaraunda, District- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manish Kumar, AC to AAG 5
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner
submitted that during pendency of the present MJC, orders have been complied. Accordingly, present MJC stands disposed of as it has become infructuous.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
(Jitendra Kumar, J)
GAURAV S./- U
Om Prakash Ram
The State of Bihar
Mrs. Ranjita
Mr. Sunil Kumar
Mr. Sunil Kumar
Mr. Rajesh Prasad Yadav
P. B. Bajanthri
Jitendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
