Sandeep Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajat Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Vinay Kirti Singh (Ga 2)

¶16

======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶18

4 03-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶19

counsel for the respondents.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of Court’s order dated 20.09.2022, the defect/s, as pointed out, could not be removed due to inadvertence.

¶21

The submission is accepted as sufficient cause for restoration of C.W.J.C. No. 10501 of 2022.

¶22

Accordingly, this application is allowed and C.W.J.C. No. 10501 of 2022 is restored to its original file and number.

¶23

Patna High Court MJC No.159 of 2023(4) dt.03-05-2023 2/2

¶24

Two weeks time, as prayed for, is allowed for removing the defect/s, as pointed out, in C.W.J.C. No. 10501 of

¶25

¶26

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶27

M.E.H/uttam/-

¶28

U

Sandeep Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sheo Shankar Trading Company Vs Bihar State Goods and Services Tax

M/s Rangoli Hardware Mach Marts Jamui Vs The Union of India

Md. Irfan Shekhra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Om Prakash Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Maheshi Yadav @ Raghubansh Jee @ Raghubans Ji Vs The State of Bihar