Petitioner sought withdrawal of his application, stating it had become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.564 of 2017
====================================================== Pradip Mahton @ Pradip Kumar Mahto, Son of Late Bilas Mahton, resident of Village Kakar, P.O. Rahiyar Kochi, P.S. Hathauri, Block Shivaji Nagar, Dist Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Smt. Archana Meenakshee, G.P. 6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER
2 25-02-2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this
application has become infructuous and accordingly, he may be permitted to withdraw this application.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.564 of 2017(2) dt.25-02-2023 2/2
In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this application is dismissed as withdrawn having
become infructuous.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
ashutosh/-
U
Pradip Mahton @ Pradip Kumar Mahto
Ram Babu Sahu
Kanik Mahton
Dilo Mahton
Manju Devi
Yamuna Sharma
Sunil Dutta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
