Petition challenged rejection of an application under Order 26 Rules 4A and 9 CPC in a Section 34 arbitration matter pending before the Sub Judge. The High Court held that the miscellaneous application was not maintainable before the Sub Judge and dismissed it with liberty to take appropriate steps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.187 of 2023
======================================================
Bindeshwar Singh son of Kamleshwar Singh, resident of Mahuari Bagicha, Sarai, P.S.- Danapur, Patna, Bihar- 801113.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ankita Kumari For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.187 of 2023(2) dt.19-09-2023 2/2
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the miscellaneous case under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was maintainable before the Sub Judge.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bindeshwar Singh
Smt. Rinki Devi
Shrikant Kumar @ Binit Kumar @ Mantu
Seema Devi
Sumit Kumar
Rohit Kumar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
