The Court granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the miscellaneous petition with liberty to file a civil revision. The present petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a civil revision and benefit under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1762 of 2018
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinu Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Purushotam Sharma, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
Office has pointed out that the present petition is not maintainable since the remedy against the impugned order lies under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure in terms of order dated 27.04.2010 passed in Civil Revision No. 1067 of 2009, reported in 2010(2) PLJR 954.
petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file civil revision petition in the matter.
withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid as well as benefit of extant
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1762 of 2018(7) dt.24-11-2023 2/2
rules including Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
DKS/-
U
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhaskarnand Son of Sri Shbash Chandra Sharma and Anr
Jai Nandan Sharma and Anr
Arun Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
