The High Court, Patna, disposed of a civil miscellaneous application seeking quashing of an order to add an intervener as a defendant in a title suit, directing the trial court to decide the suit within a year.
Direction to the trial court to decide the title suit within one year and report compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1522 of 2018
======================================================
Radha Binod Kumar son of Late Brahamdeo Sah @ Brahamdev Prasad Resident of Village and P.O.- Sadpur, Pergana Sub- Division- Ballia, P.S. and Anchal- Sahebpur Kamal, District- Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjan Kumar Dubey, Mr. Ashish Anand, Adv Mr. Bambam Kumar, Adv Mr. Binod Gautam For the Respondent/s : Mr.Abhoy Kumar Sinha Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
8 29-08-2023 Heard the parties.
dated 11.07.2018 passed in Title Suit No. 257 of 2006 passed by
Learned Sub Judge cum A.C.J.M., Ballia, Begusarai.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1522 of 2018(8) dt.29-08-2023 2/2
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Sunnykr/-
U T
Radha Binod Kumar
Jawahar Mahto and Ors.
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
