filed on 21.07.2014 for recalling the order dated 25.06.2014 but the learned Sub-Judge-VII also dismissed this application vide order dated 02.02.2015. Learned counsel further submits that this order was passed without considering the fact that the earlier application was dismissed in default and it was not rejected after considering the merits of the said application. Even the order dated 02.02.2015 does not mention anything except the fact that as the earlier application was rejected due to non attendance of the learned counsel of the plaintiffs, the said order could not be recalled. Learned counsel further submits that several dates were fixed in the present matter before 25.06.2014 and the learned counsel for the plaintiffs/petitioners was present all such dates but unfortunately on 25.06.2014, as the learned for the plaintiffs/petitioners was engaged in other court during relevant time, therefore, he could not appear before the court and the application dated 21.03.2014 came to be dismissed. Learned counsel further submits that the application dated 21.03.2014 was for proper adjudication of the case and not deciding the same on its merit would adversely affect the plaintiffs/petitioners.
