The High Court dismissed a civil appeal as withdrawn because the appellant's counsel submitted that the parties were living together, rendering the petition unexecutable.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.909 of 2018
======================================================
Mukesh Kumar Singh Son of Sri Chandrashekhar Singh, Resident of Rahul Nagar, P.S.-Ekma, District-Saran Chapra.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Abhay Shankar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
7 26-06-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the present petition does not survive for consideration in the light of later development that both the parties are living together.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
( Jitendra Kumar, J)
skm/-
U
Mukesh Kumar Singh
Shridhi Singh
Vinay Kumar Singh
P. B. Bajanthri
Jitendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
