Insurance company sought to withdraw its miscellaneous appeal, stating the underlying judgment and award had been satisfied; no one appeared for the appellant and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with the statutory deposit ordered returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.85 of 2023
======================================================
National Insurance Company Ltd.
... ... Appellant
Versus
Manju Kuar & Ors.
... ... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : None For the Respondents : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
ORAL ORDER
3 24-08-2023
Today, this case has been listed under the heading for “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of the counsel for the
appellant.
submission in the mentioning slip that the judgment and award has been satisfied by the appellant and sought permission to withdraw the appeal.
Patna High Court MA No.85 of 2023(3) dt.24-08-2023 2/2
of this appeal to the appellant.
(Khatim Reza, J)
Gaurav Kumar/-
U
National Insurance Company Ltd.
Manju Kuar
Ors.
Khatim Reza
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
