COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous…
Permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file before the District Judge; time consumed excluded for limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.163 of 2023
======================================================
M/s Shiv Shanti Enterprises 201, 2nd Floor, Capital Tower, Block - A, Frazer Road, Patna through its Proprietor Vikash Kumar Goenka, Aged about 41 years, Male, Son of Sri Vijay Kumar Goenka, Resident of 402, Shree Apartment, S.P. Verma Road, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, Town and District Patna.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Priya Gupta Mr.Mohit Agarwal For the Respondent/s : Mr.Piyush Lall For the BIADA : Mr.Parth Gaurav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
present.
Ld. counsel for the appellant submits that on account of pecuniary jurisdiction, this appeal should have been filed before the District Judge but inadvertently the same has been filed in this Court.
Patna High Court MA No.163 of 2023(2) dt.27-03-2023 2/2
Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to file an appropriate appeal before the District Judge of competent jurisdiction.
Permission is granted.
This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
It is clarified that the time consumed before this Court should be excluded while considering the issue of limitation in regard to filing appeal.
(Jitendra Kumar, J)
uttam/-
U
M/s Shiv Shanti Enterprises
The Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority
JITENDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
