Asheshar Nath Sah v. Dhrup Prasad Singh and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Patna dismissed the First Appeal. The court directed the return of the memo of appeal for filing before the appropriate forum (District Judge) due to a pecuniary jurisdiction objection raised by counsel.
What did the court decide?
Office directed to return the memo of appeal and certified copy of the judgment to the advocate on record for filing before the appropriate forum.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FIRST APPEAL No.82 of 2018
======================================================
Asheshar Nath Sah, Son of Banshi Lal Sah, resident of village- Mirganj, P.S. Mirganj, District- Gopalganj
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
- Dhrup Prasad Singh, 2. Prabhu Prasad Singh, both sons of Deoraj Prasad Singh, resident of village- Mirganj, P.S. - Mirganj, District- Gopalganj
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ayush Kumar, Advocate Mr. Kanishk Kaustubh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
ORAL ORDER
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Asheshar Nath Sah
- respondent
Dhrup Prasad Singh
- respondent
Prabhu Prasad Singh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court