First appeal pending since 1995; neither party appeared on repeated dates despite cautioning. Appeal dismissed for default under Order XLI Rule 17 CPC as the appellant showed no interest in prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
FIRST APPEAL No.715 of 1995
======================================================
M/S East India Transport Agencym Muzaffarpur (Through and Summons to be served on the Branch Manager, M/s East India Transport Agency, Sikandarpur Road, Muzaffarpur – 842001.
... ... Defendant/Appellant
Versus
…. Plaintiff / Respondent
……….. Defendant / Respondent
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s : None
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
10 02-05-2023 Nobody appears on behalf of either of the parties.
Even on the last date, no one had appeared on
behalf of the Appellant or the Respondents and parties were
cautioned to attend the matter, failing which legal consequences was to follow.
Patna High Court FA No.715 of 1995(10) dt.02-05-2023 2/2
However, despite such cautioning, parties have not
attended the matter, which shows that the Appellant has lost interest to prosecute his appeal.
Hence, this appeal is dismissed for default under Rule 17 of Order XLI of CPC.
(Jitendra Kumar, J)
skm/-
U
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s East India Transport Agency, Muzaffarpur
Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.
M/s East India Transport Agnency, Calcutta
Jitendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
