Disposed

Kishore Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Dec 2023CWJC/9798/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged an allotment of shop no. 4. The court directed the executive officer to correct his action based on records and called on the district magistrate to take appropriate action within six weeks of filing the representation.

What did the court decide?

Director the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Dhaka, to correct his action based on records and the District Magistrate to take appropriate action within six weeks.

Kishore Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Public Procurement and Tenders | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9798 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Kishore Kumar Son of Late Ram Chandra Prasad @ Ram Chandra Prasad Choudhary Resident of Village-Dhaka, Ramchandra Patel Nagar, Ward No. 21, Nagar Parishad-Dhaka, P.S.-Dhaka, District-East Champaran, Motihari.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary Urban Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary Urban Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Secretary, Nagar Panchayat Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Excutive Officer, Naar Panchayat, Dhaka District-East Champaran, Motihari.

¶10

Sri Prabhakar Tiwari S/o Sri Gajendra Tiwari Resident of Village-Dhaka, Ramchandra Patel Nagar, Ward No. 21, Nagar Parishad-Dhaka, P.S.-Dhaka, District-East Champaran, Motihari.

¶11

Sri Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Prasad S/o Late Ram Ayodhiya Resident of Village-Dhaka, Ramchandra Patel Nagar, Ward No. 21, Nagar ParishadDhaka, P.S.-Dhaka, District-East Champaran, Motihari.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Subhash Pd. Singh, GA-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 21-12-2023 Heard Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, learned counsel

¶15

appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Subhash Prasad Singh, learned GA-3 for the respondent/s.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to file a detailed representation before the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, East Champaran.

¶17

The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Dhakar, is directed to correct his action on the basis of records with respect

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.9798 of 2023(2) dt.21-12-2023 2/2

¶19

to the allotment of shop no. 4, allegedly which was allotted to the petitioner.

¶20

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate, East Champaran to take appropriate action within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of the representation.

¶21

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶22

Niraj/-

¶23

Kishore Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishore Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jamilur Rahman Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Ranjan @ Amit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ajay Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Aim Addcom Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar

Bihar Pradesh Mukhiya Sangh Vs The State of Bihar

Sujit Ram @ Babi Vs the State of Bihar