Dismissed
Ghuran Paswan v. The State of Bihar
Patna HCCWJC/9292/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9292 of 2023
======================================================
Ghuran Paswan S/o- Charitar Paswan, Resident of Village- Kansi, P.O.Kansi, P.S.- Simri, District- Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kalyan Shankar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. M. Nasrul Huda Khan ( SC-1 )
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
which it has been specifically stated that encroachment case has been registered and notice has been issued as also an order passed on the very same subject land, the petitioner is concerned with. We would not make any observation on the merits since
Patna High Court CWJC No.9292 of 2023(4) dt.02-11-2023 2/2
the respondent, who is stated to be an encroacher would also have the remedy to file an appeal.
2. However, we find that there is absolutely no
necessity to keep the writ petition pending, we dismiss the same.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Rajiv Roy, J)
sharun/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is any necessity to keep the writ petition pending when an encroachment case is already registered and an order passed.
Ghuran Paswan
The State of Bihar
The District Magistrate
The B.D.O.
The C.O.
The Panchayat Secretary
Chief Justice
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court