Petitioner's counsel argued that the issue was already decided in a Division Bench judgment, making the present writ petition infructuous. The court disposed of the petition accordingly under Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9116 of 2016
======================================================
Kumari Nilam Devi Wife of Sri Surendra Ram resident of village - Ramaiya, P.S. Mohiuddinnagar, District - Samastipur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raisul Haque, SC-10 Mr. Binay Kumar, AC to SC-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
Patna High Court CWJC No.9116 of 2016(3) dt.05-12-2023 2/2
disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ibrar//-
U
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Civil Review No. 59 of 2018Referred¶16
Kumari Nilam Devi
The State Of Bihar
The Director, (Primary and Elementary Education)
The Director Mass Education
The Commissioner, Darbhanga Division
District Superintendent of Education, Samastipur
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
