Petitioner, a retired police constable, claims unpaid increments from 2007 and 2008. The court directed respondents to calculate arrears and dispose of pending representations on merits instead of issuing interim orders.
Respondents directed to pay due increments if entitled and to dispose of pending representations by passing appropriate orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8960 of 2023
======================================================
Md. Quaiser Khan Late Wasi Ahmad Khan, resident of Village- Govindpur, Khajuri, Ward no. 7, Kishunpur, P.S. - Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj (GP 5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the respondents.
the prayer to admit the application and issue Rule NISI, calling upon the respondents as to why the relief sought for in the writ application be not allowed or to pass any order or orders as deem fit and proper to this Court.
post of constable on 19.02.1982 in Bihar police under Samastipur District Police Force and retired from service on
Patna High Court CWJC No.8960 of 2023(2) dt.02-12-2023 2/3
31.05.2020 at the age of superannuation from the post of Sub Inspector of Police. After his retirement, he found that his last pay is less than other constables, who joined along with him, and came to know that their last payment of salary was Rs. 58,600/- while his last payment was Rs. 55,200/-.
Patna High Court CWJC No.8960 of 2023(2) dt.02-12-2023 3/3
the representations of the petitioner and directed to dispose of the writ application.
disposed of.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
Spd/-
U
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to arrears of pay increments due for 2007 and 2008.
Whether the pending representations of the petitioner have been disposed of in a timely manner.
Whether Rule NISI should be issued to allow adjudication on the merits of the pension claim.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
none cited in the operative partReferred
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Md. Quaiser Khan
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar
The Director General of Police, Bihar
The Accountant General of Police Bihar
The Inspector General of Police, Mithila Region
The Superintendent of Police, Samastipur
G. Anupama Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
