A single-judge bench dismissed a writ petition filed by two petitioners against the State of Bihar and revenue officials solely because no representative appeared before the court on the hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8013 of 2023
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Binita Singh (SC- 28) Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, A.C. to S.C. 28
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
3 23-06-2023 None appears for the petitioner. Even on 19.06.2023
Patna High Court CWJC No.8013 of 2023(3) dt.23-06-2023 2/2
when the matter was called out, none appeared for the petitioner.
Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed for default.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Partha Sarthy, J)
P.K.P./Anushka
U
Bamshankar Jha
Manoj Kumar Jha
The State of Bihar
K. Vinod Chandran
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
