The High Court of Patna dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel stated they had no instruction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7909 of 2015
======================================================
Dr. Krishna Kumar Roy Anil son of late Satrughan Ray Resident of villageNew Balbhadrapur, P.S. Laheriasarai District- Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Bhagat, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Chandra Mohan Singh, Advocate Mr. Izbal Asif Niazi, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 17-02-2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is
not having any instruction.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for
non-prosecution.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
Amrendra/Item No. 37
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 20.02.2023 Transmission Date
Dr. Krishna Kumar Roy
The Vice Chancellor of L N M University Darbhanga
The Registrar LNM University Darbhanga
The Finance Officer LNM University Darbhanga
The Principal, R.K. College Madhubani
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
