Khageshwar Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Patna dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as no petitioner appeared and the respondent counsel was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7858 of 2017
======================================================
Khageshwar Manjhi son of Late Tikari Manjhi, Resident of Village- Nakata Khurd, Panchayat, Nakata Khurd, Anchal Police Station- Palasi, DistrictAraria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, AC to SC4
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR)
time.
Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the
State is present.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
( Satyavrat Verma, J)
rishi/-
U
Khageshwar Manjhi
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Food and Civil Supply Department
The District Magistrate, Araria
The Licensing Authority-cum-Sub Divisional Officer, Araria
The Block Supply-cum-Marketing Officer, Palasi
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
SATYAVRAT VERMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court