Quashed

Mahamaya Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Dec 2023CWJC/750/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitioner challenged cancellation of arms license cancelled without personal notice despite physical verification schedule. Court quashed orders allowing fresh proceeding after personal notice and hearing, noting pending murder case.

What did the court decide?

Impugned orders cancelling arms license quashed with liberty to initiate suspension proceedings after personal notice and hearing.

Mahamaya Prasad Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.750 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Mahamaya Prasad Son of Jagrnath Prasad, Resident of Village- Garar, P.S. Andar, District- Siwan, Bihar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Home Depatment, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Additional Chief Secretary, Home Depatment, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Divisional Commissioner, Saran Range, Chhapra, Biha.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Siwan, Bihar.

¶10

The District Arms Magistrate, Siwan, Bihar.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prashant Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sheo Shankar Prasad ( Sc 8 ) ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶14

4 18-12-2023 Heard the parties.

¶15

The arms license of the petitioner has been cancelled only because he did not produce his arms for physical verification pursuant to a general notice.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the period during which the arms was to be physically verified, his arms was seized by the police.

¶17

In these circumstances, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 8.3.2022 and the appellate order 26.08.2022 by which the original order of cancellation has been affirmed.

¶18

This Court has earlier also held that service of personal notice before cancellation of arms license is a must and arms license of the petitioner cannot be cancelled/suspended because of non-compliance of general notice and the impugned

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.750 of 2023(4) dt.18-12-2023 2/2

¶20

order dated 8.3.2022 and the appellate order 26.08.2022 by which the original order of cancellation has been affirmed may be quashed.

¶21

On this, learned counsel for the State has submitted that the petitioner is not eligible to hold arms license as he is accused in a murder case which is pending and therefore the arms license cannot be restored.

¶22

In view of the above submissions, the impugned order dated 8.3.2022 and the appellate order dated 26.08.2022 are hereby quashed with liberty to the District Magistrate, Siwan to initiate an appropriate proceeding in accordance with law against the petitioner for suspension/cancellation of arms license and after personal notice and after hearing the petitioner the District Magistrate, Siwan can pass an order.

¶23

The District Magistrate, Siwan will consider the facts of the case and shall not be prejudiced by any observation of this Court before passing any order.

¶24

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶25

Vikas/-

¶26

Mahamaya Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahamaya Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rabindra Nath Roy @ Rabi Roy Vs The State of Bihar

Nitu Sahi alias Nitu Surendra Sahi Vs The State of Bihar

Nagendra Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Jeevan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Salahuddin Gaddi Vs The State of Bihar

Prema Devi Vs The State of Bihar