Disposed

Dr. Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Oct 2023CWJC/7194/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this civil writ petition concerning land possession, the High Court did not grant immediate writ relief. Instead, it directed the petitioner to file a detailed representation with documents to the District Magistrate within six weeks for a reasoned order within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the petitioner to file a representation with documents before the District Magistrate within six weeks for examination and a reasoned order within three months.

Dr. Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7194 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Dr. Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Kumar Son of Sri Laxuman Singh @ Lakshman Singh, Resident of Mohalla-Nayaka Gaon, Ward No.31, Post Office and Police Station-Sasaram, District-Rohtas (Sasaram).

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate Cum Collector Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶8

The Additional Collector Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶9

The Sub Divisional Officer, Sasaram, District Rohtas.

¶10

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms Sasaram, District Rohtas.

¶11

The Circle Officer, Sasaram, District Rohtas.

¶12

The Commissioner, Sasara, Municipal Corporation Sasaram, District Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶13

The Chief Executive Officer, Municipal Corporation Sasaram, District Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad, Advocate For the Sate : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha (Sc19) For the respondent : Mr. Bajarangi lal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 03-10-2023

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶18

State.

¶19

This writ application is filed for direction to the respondents not to interfere in the right, title and possession of petitioner's land appertaining to C.S. Khata No. 39, R.S. Khata No. 74, C.S. Plot No. 194, R.S. Plot No. 344, area 3 Bigha 8 Kattha, C.S. Plot No. 195, R.S. Plot No. 345, area 3 Bigha 8 Kattha, C.S. Khata No. 333, R.S. Khata No. 74. C.S. Plot No.

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.7194 of 2023(2) dt.03-10-2023 2/3

¶21

795, R.S. Plot No. 345 area 1 acre 14 decimal thana No. 139, Tauzi No. 5639, Khesra No. 1, Anchal Sasaram situated at Mohalla Nayaka Gaon, P.S. Sasaram, District-Rohtas since the civil court has passed judgment and degree in Title Suit No. 349 of 2006 and Title Suit No. 507 of 2005 which has been affirmed in Title Appeal No. 94 of 2013 and Appeal No 95 of 2013 vide order and judgment dated 27.11.2014, passed by the Learned District Judgment Rohtas at Sasaram, with regard to land mentioned above in favour of the Petitioner and to direct the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation dated 07.02.2023, submitted by the petitioner and restrain themselves from taking forceful possession or allotment of the petitioner's land. And to grant any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled under the facts and circumstances of the instant writ petition .

¶22

3 . In the facts and circumstances of the case, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation before the District Magistrate, cum Collector Rohtas at Sasaram (respondent No. 2) along with all the relevant documents in support of the claim, within a period of six weeks from today .

¶23

In the event, such representation is filed by the

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.7194 of 2023(2) dt.03-10-2023 3/3

¶25

petitioners respondent No. 2 shall examine the claim of the petitioner and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within a further period of three months.

¶26

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶27

Kaushik/-

¶28

U T

Dr. Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Wahid @ Md. Wajid Vs The State of Bihar

Basant Kumar @ Basant Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Radhe Shyam Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Lilanath Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Braj Kishor Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Rajendra Mahto Vs The State of Bihar