Disposed

Arjun Sharma v. State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC9 Oct 2023CWJC/71/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge disposed of a writ application seeking to quash letters and direct protection of interests in a Jalkar matter. The court observed the petitioner could seek remedy in the appropriate forum, noting limitation is a question for the competent authority.

What did the court decide?

Observation that the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek remedy before the appropriate forum as may be available to him in accordance with law.

Arjun Sharma Vs State Of Bihar and Ors. — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.71 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Arjun Sharma S/o Late Devi Sharma, Resident of Village- Laxmipur, Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department, Bihar, Patna

¶7

District Fisheries Officer, Katihar, Bihar.

¶8

District Magistrate, Katihar, Bihar.

¶9

Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Katihar.

¶10

Superintendent of Police, Katihar, Bihar.

¶11

Officer-in-Charge, Pranpur Police Station, Katihar.

¶12

Pranpur Prakhand Matasyajivi Sahyog Samiti Limited having its office at Roshna, Police Station- Pra Son of Late Ghanshyam Prasad Singh, resident of Village- Roshna Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

¶13

Kunal Nishad, Son of Late Ghanshyam Prasad Singh, resident of VillageRoshna Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar at present secretaryPranpur Prakhand Matasyajivi Sahyog Samiti Limited having its office at Roshna, Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

¶14

Pankaj Kumar Sharma, S/o Shri Shambhu Sharma, resident of VillageLaxmipur, Post Dharhan, Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

¶15

Satish Sharma, S/o not known to the petitioner, resident of VillageLaxmipur, Post Dharhan, Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

¶16

Putli Devi, W/o not known to the petitioner, resident of Village- Rahika Post Dharhan, Police Station Pranpur, District- Katihar.

¶17

Bechan Sharma, S/o not known to the petitioner, resident of VillageLaxmipur, Post Dharhan, Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

¶18

Pinku Sharma, S/o not known to the petitioner, resident of VillageLaxmipur, Post Dharhan, Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

¶19

Mani Lal Sharma, S/o not known to the petitioner, resident of VillageLaxmipur, Post Dharhan, Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

¶20

Chandan Sharma, S/o not known to the petitioner, resident of VillageLaxmipur, Post Dharhan, Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

¶21

Pinka Sharma, W/o not known to the petitioner, resident of Village- Rahika, Post Dharhan, Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

¶22

Bharat Sharma, S/o not known to the petitioner, resident of VillageLaxmipur, Post Dharhan, Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

¶23

Mangan Sharma, S/o not known to the petitioner, resident of VillageLaxmipur, Post Dharhan, Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

¶24

======================================================

¶25

... ... Respondent/s

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.71 of 2019(2) dt.09-10-2023

¶27

2/3

¶28

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Uma Kant Tiwary For the Respondent/s : Mr.Md.Khurshid Alam -Aag12 ======================================================

¶29

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶30

2 09-10-2023

¶31

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State.

¶32

This writ application has been filed for following

¶33

reliefs:

¶34

(i) An appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the letters dated 18.08.2018 and 11.10.2019, declaring the same as illegal, void and without jurisdiction, be issued.

¶35

(ii) An appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents 1^st Set especially the respondents no. 3 to 6 to protect the interest of the petitioner with respect to the Jalkar in question, be issued.

¶36

The writ petition is disposed with an observation that the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek remedy before the appropriate forum as may be available to him in accordance with law.

¶37

It goes without saying that if any question of limitation arises before the competent authority, the same shall be considered taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the issue before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

¶38

The writ petition stands disposed of with the

¶39

Patna High Court CWJC No.71 of 2019(2) dt.09-10-2023 3/3

¶40

aforesaid observation and direction.

¶41

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶42

anay/-

¶43

Arjun Sharma v. State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arjun Sharma v. State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandeshwar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Kashindra Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Brambhdeo Prasad Singh @ Brahmdeo Prasad Singh. Vs The State of Bihar

Abhimanyu Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shiv Shankar Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Suresh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.