Disposed

Md. Amir Hussain v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Dec 2023CWJC/7000/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge by a one-page order disposed the writ petition. Counsel submitted the Municipal Building Tribunal is now functional. Consequently, no adjudication was made on the merits, and the petitioners were directed to approach the Tribunal.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands disposed of. Petitioners may seek interim protection by filing an application before the Municipal Building Tribunal.

Md. Amir Hussain Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7000 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Md. Amir Hussain, son of Late Abdul Khalique

¶4

Nazia Yasmeen, Daughter of Md. Asiruddin, wife of Md. Amir Hussain Both are Resident of Mohalla- Hirdayganj, Kosi Colony, Ward No. 1, Post Office- Katihar, Police Station- Sahayak, district- Katihar.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

Special Work Officer, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

Municipal Corporation,Katihar Through Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Katihar.

¶10

¶11

Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Katihar.

¶12

Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Junior Engineer, Nagar Nigam Katihar.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Helal Ahmad, Advocate For the State : Mr.Yogendra Pd. Sinha (Aag7) For the Nagar Nigam : Mr. Vinay Ranjan, Advocate

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶16

Date : 18-12-2023

¶17

Heard Mr. Md. Helal Ahmad, learned counsel appearing

¶18

on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. Yogendra Pd. Sinha learned AAG 7 for the State and Mr. Vinay Ranjan, learned counsel for the Municipal Corporation, Katihar.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners informs this Court that petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 03.02.2023 contained in Memo No.321.

¶20

Mr. Vinay Ranjan, learned counsel appearing on

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.7000 of 2023 dt.18-12-2023 2/2

¶22

behalf of the Municipal Corporation, Katihar, on instruction, submits that the Municipal Building Tribunal, Patna is functional and petitioners have already represented before it.

¶23

Considering the fact that Tribunal is now functional and petitioners have already represented before it, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶24

Petitioners may seek interim protection by filing an application in accordance with law before the Tribunal.

¶25

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶26

Sanjay/-

¶27

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	20.12.2023
Transmission Date	NA

Md. Amir Hussain v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Amir Hussain v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Amit Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Mokim Vs the State of Bihar

Binod Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vimla Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Md Sarjan Alam Vs The State of Bihar