The High Court dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear despite repeated calls, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6807 of 2023
======================================================
Husna Ara D/o Late Mohammad Faiz Alam, R/o Mohalla- Dariyapur, Bari Road, Opposite Patna Collegiate School, P.S.- Pirbhore, District- Patna 800004
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.Ravi Ranjan, AC to SC-22 For the Bank : Mr. Sanjay Singh Thakur, Adv. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
3 26-06-2023 Despite repeated calls, nobody has bothered to appear for the petitioner, hence, it appears that the petitioner has got no interest in prosecuting the present writ petition, thus, this Court has no option but to dismiss the present writ petition for want of prosecution.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
Ajay/- U
Husna Ara
The State of Bihar
Indian Overseas Bank
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
