Writ petition sought removal of encroachment by private respondents over the petitioner's plot and restoration of possession. Counsel did not press the petition; the court dismissed it, granting liberty to pursue alternative remedies available under law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6681 of 2017
======================================================
Sukari Devi W/o Sri Yogendra Das, Resident of Village-Chhatpokhar, Punchwari Colony Madhepura, Pargana Haweli, P.S.-Khazanchi Hat, Distt.Purnea
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Mallick,Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha,SC-19
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition has been filed
“1.(i) To direct the respondents 1 set to remove the unauthorized encroachment by the respondents 2 set over the plot of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6681 of 2017(2) dt.21-04-2023 2/2
(ii) To direct the respondents 1 set to ensure the possession over the plot of the petitioner which is illegally captured by the respondents 2nd set as per the measurement by the Government Amin on due process.
(iii) To direct the respondents 6 & 7 to vacate the plot area of the plot which is forcibly captured by the 2nd set taking all the possible legal steps to remove them and also the plot to be fenced.”
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.
The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
S.Sb/Sonal-
U
Sukari Devi
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Land and Revenue Department
The Divisional Commissioner, Purnea
The Collector, Purnea
The District Development Officer, Purnea
The Superintendent of Police, Purnia
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
