Disposed

M/s Namo Narayan Consultants Private Limited v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Jun 2023CWJC/5541/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by a taxpayer seeking stay on recovery of tax dues due to non-constitution of the Appellate Tribunal under the Bihar GST Act. The Court directed that stay on recovery be extended only upon depositing an additional 20% of the disputed tax and required the petitioner to file the appeal immediately upon the Tribunal's constitution.

What did the court decide?

Stay on recovery of tax and release of attached bank accounts granted subject to deposit of 20% of remaining tax; petitioner directed to file appeal after Tribunal constitution.

M/s Namo Narayan Consultants Private Limited Vs The State… — GST and Indirect Tax | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5541 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

M/s Namo Narayan Consultants Private Limited a private Limited Company concern having its office at House No.- 16, Kailash Enclave, Sheopuri, L.B.S. Nagar, Patna- 800023 through its Director Sabita Barik, Gender- Female, aged about 48 years, Wife of Shri Hemant Kumar Barik, Resident of Vyas Nagar, Magistrate Colony, Post- Ashiana Nagar, Police Station- Rajeev Nagar, Dist- Patna, Bihar- 800025

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, State Tax, Bihar, Patna having its office at Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary cum Commissioner, Department of State Taxes, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Additional Commissioner of State Taxes, (Appeal), Central Division, Patna, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Patna Special Circle, Patna.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivek Prasad, GP-7 ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and

¶14

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶15

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶16

3 26-06-2023 The instant writ petition has been filed under Article

¶17

226 of the Constitution of India seeking multifarious reliefs.

¶18

The petitioner essentially is desirous of availing statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order before the Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "Tribunal" ) under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "B.G.S.T. Act").

¶19

However, due to non-constitution of the Tribunal , the

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.5541 of 2023(3) dt.26-06-2023 2/4

¶21

petitioner is deprived of his statutory remedy under Sub-Section (8) and Sub-Section (9) of Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act.

¶22

Under the circumstances, the petitioner is also prevented from availing the benefit of stay of recovery of balance amount of tax in terms of Section 112 (8) and (9) of the B.G.S.T Act upon deposit of the amounts as contemplated under Sub-section (8) of Section 112.

¶23

The respondent State authorities have acknowledged the fact of non-constitution of the Tribunal and come out with a notification bearing Order No. 09/2019-State Tax, S. O. 399, dated 11.12.2019 for removal of difficulties, in exercise of powers under Section 172 of the B.G.S.T Act, which provides that period of limitation for the purpose of preferring an appeal before the Tribunal under Section 112 shall start only after the date on which the President, or the State President, as the case may be, of the Tribunal after its constitution under Section 109 of the B.G.S.T Act, enters office.

¶24

This Court is, therefore, inclined to dispose of the instant writ petition in the following terms:-

¶25

(i) Subject to deposit of a sum equal to 20 percent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute, if not already deposited, in addition to the amount deposited earlier under Sub-Section (6) of Section 107 of the B.G.S.T. Act, the petitioner must be extended the statutory benefit

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.5541 of 2023(3) dt.26-06-2023 3/4

¶27

of stay under Sub-Section (9) of Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act. The petitioner cannot be deprived of the benefit, due to non- constitution of the Tribunal by the respondents themselves. The recovery of balance amount, and any steps that may have been taken in this regard will thus be deemed to be stayed. It is not in dispute that similar relief has been granted by this Court in the case of SAJ Food Products Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State of Bihar & Others in C.W.J.C. No. 15465 of 2022 .

¶28

(ii) The statutory relief of stay, on deposit of the statutory amount, however in the opinion of this Court, cannot be open ended. For balancing the equities, therefore, the Court is of the opinion that since order is being passed due to nonconstitution of the Tribunal by the respondentAuthorities, the petitioner would be required to present/file his appeal under Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act, once the Tribunal is constituted and made functional and the President or the State President may enter office. The appeal would be required to be filed observing the statutory requirements after coming into existence of the Tribunal, for facilitating consideration of the appeal.

¶29

(iii) In case the petitioner chooses not to avail the remedy of appeal by filing any appeal under Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act before the Tribunal within the period which may be specified upon constitution of the Tribunal, the respondent- Authorities would be at liberty to proceed further in the matter, in accordance with law.

¶30

(iv) If the above order is complied with and a sum equivalent to 20 per cent of the remaining amount of the tax in dispute is paid then, if there is any attachment of the bank account of the petitioner pursuant to the demand, the same shall

¶31

Patna High Court CWJC No.5541 of 2023(3) dt.26-06-2023 4/4

¶32

be released.

¶33

With the above liberty, observation and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶34

The learned counsel submits that the entire disputed tax has been paid. If that is so, there is no requirement for recovery at all, but if it is otherwise stay of recovery can be only on deposit of 20% as directed above.

¶35

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)

¶36

( Partha Sarthy, J)

¶37

Saurabh/Bibhash

¶38

M/s Namo Narayan Consultants Private Limited v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Namo Narayan Consultants Private Limited v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Amalti Devi Vs The Punjab National Bank

Ram Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Devi Mai Ki Kutia (Motinagar Bheriya Suara) Vs The State of Bihar

Suresh Chaudhary @ Suresh Kumar Vs State of Bihar

M/s Bharat Traders Vs The State of Bihar

M/s Krishi Bhawan Vs The State of Bihar