Disposed

Ramesh Kumar Ram v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Jan 2023CWJC/5290/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court refused to entertain a writ petition filed by an individual who was not an aspirant for a P.D.S. license. The court dismissed the plea challenging the grant of a license to respondent no. 8, noting the petitioner's lack of standing to challenge the selection.

What did the court decide?

The petition stands disposed of; the petitioner is directed to approach the appropriate authority to challenge his selection.

Ramesh Kumar Ram Vs The State of Bihar — Property and Title | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5290 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ramesh Kumar Ram S/o Sonay Ram R/o Village, Post and PanchayatJeewachhpur Ward No.1, Tola-Saraswatipur, Block-Chhatapur, Ps-Bhimpur and Distt-Supaul.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Food Sonsumer Protaction Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

Sub Divisional Officer, Triveniganj, Supaul

¶8

District Supply Officer, Supaul

¶9

Director, DRDA, Supaul

¶10

Deputy Collector, Supaul

¶11

District Magistrate, Supaul

¶12

Commissioner, Kosi, Saharsa

¶13

Rajan Kumar S/o Ramvrit @ Ramprit Mukhiya R/oJeewachhpur, BlockChhatapur, PS-Bhimpur, Distt.-Supaul.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance :

¶17

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Verma, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Alok Ranjan, AC to AAG -5

¶18

======================================================

¶19

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and

¶20

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶21

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR)

¶22

3 03-01-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶23

The petitioner though not an aspirant for grant of

¶24

P.D.S. license under the reserved category, has chosen to

¶25

file this petition against the grant of license to respondent

¶26

no. 8, who also does not fall in such category.

¶27

We refuse to entertain this petition at the instance

¶28

Patna High Court CWJC No.5290 of 2020(3) dt.03-01-2023 2/2

¶29

of the petitioner, who was not even an aspirant for the grant

¶30

of license, for which respondent no. 8 has been selected.

¶31

It would be open for the petitioner, though, to

¶32

challenge his selection as P.D.S. licensee, in case so desired, before the appropriate authority.

¶33

With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands

¶34

disposed of.

¶35

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶36

sunilkumar/-

¶37

( Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶38

Ramesh Kumar Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Kumar Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Muneshwar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Abhimanyu Kumar Singh Vs The Branch Manager, Idbi Bank Ltd.

Umesh Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Murari Prasad Singh, Vs The State of Bihar