Writ application dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner had no instructions from his counsel; no merits examined.
Application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4969 of 2013
======================================================
Rajesh Kumar Tiwary Son of Trew Nath Tiwary Resident Of Flat No. B2, C/O Sudhir Kumar, Swaraj Path Tilaknagar, P.S. - Patrakar Nagar, District - Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anupa Nand Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Ms. Nutan Sahay, A.C. to AAG 12
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
ORAL ORDER
counsel for the respondents are present.
submits that he has no instructions in the matter.
merits of the case of the parties, this application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Partha Sarthy, J)
Saurabh/- U
Rajesh Kumar Tiwary
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar
The Principal Secretary Department of Education Bihar
The Union of India through its Secretary Department of School Education and Literacy
The Regional Director, NCTE, Eastern Regional Committee
The National Council For Teacher Education
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
